mirrors/emacs
1
Fork 0
mirror of git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git synced 2025-12-26 07:11:34 -08:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Two more entries (yes, I'm easily amused).

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Juanma Barranquero 2006-11-10 16:57:46 +00:00
parent e48376d4a1
commit ac2072cdbf
2 changed files with 27 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
etc/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,13 +1,17 @@
2006-11-10 Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
* DEVEL.HUMOR: Two more entries.
2006-11-10 Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
* orgcard.tex (section{Archiving}): Document C-TAB.
(section{TODO Items and Checkboxes}): Checkbox keys moved to this
section, added documentation for the key `C-c #'.
2006-11-05 Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawek@cs.lth.se> (tiny change)
2006-11-05 Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawek@cs.lth.se> (tiny change)
* emacs.py (eargs): Provide eldoc message for builtin types.
Make sure eargs always outputs sentinel, to avoid emacs freeze.
Make sure eargs always outputs sentinel, to avoid Emacs freeze.
2006-10-22 Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>

21
etc/DEVEL.HUMOR
View file

@ -136,3 +136,24 @@ without attempting any course of action that requires an advance
course in divination.
There'd be quite a sensational market for that, you know."
-- Emilio Lopes and David Kastrup
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"[T]here may be a good reason since the code explicitly checks for
this; see keyboard.c:789 [...]"
"I think I understand, but I can't find the code in keyboard.c. Do
you really mean 'line 789'? Of which revision?"
"Sorry; by 789, I mean 3262 :-P"
-- Chong Yidong and Stefan Monnier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"[...] In my opinion, your change does not either increase or
decrease readability. It's a tossup."
"Uh, setting tem to '', an artificial empty string, in order to have
j incremented once again before breaking out of the finished loop is
readable?
Is this kind of 'readable' synonymous to 'comprehensible with
serious effort', reminiscent of mathematicians' use of 'trivial' as
synonymous with 'provable with serious effort'?"
-- RMS and David Kastrup