bump asdf

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Kochmanski 2017-09-30 16:07:10 +02:00
parent fe392867c3
commit 4915f8bc33
2 changed files with 16 additions and 15 deletions

View file

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
- ~ext:run-program~: environ argument defaults to ~:default~, when NIL
passed empty environment is used
- compiler: when gcc fails ecl prints the failing command output
- ASDF has been updated to 3.1.8.7
- ASDF has been updated to 3.1.8.8
- package local nicknames has been implemented (after SBCL)
- hash table extensions are documented in newdoc
- various cleanups performed in the compiler

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
;;; -*- mode: Lisp; Base: 10 ; Syntax: ANSI-Common-Lisp ; buffer-read-only: t; -*-
;;; This is ASDF 3.1.8.7: Another System Definition Facility.
;;; This is ASDF 3.1.8.8: Another System Definition Facility.
;;;
;;; Feedback, bug reports, and patches are all welcome:
;;; please mail to <asdf-devel@common-lisp.net>.
@ -7274,7 +7274,7 @@ previously-loaded version of ASDF."
;; "3.4.5.67" would be a development version in the official branch, on top of 3.4.5.
;; "3.4.5.0.8" would be your eighth local modification of official release 3.4.5
;; "3.4.5.67.8" would be your eighth local modification of development version 3.4.5.67
(asdf-version "3.1.8.7")
(asdf-version "3.1.8.8")
(existing-version (asdf-version)))
(setf *asdf-version* asdf-version)
(when (and existing-version (not (equal asdf-version existing-version)))
@ -9641,8 +9641,9 @@ to be meaningful, or could it just as well have been done in another Lisp image?
;;;; Visiting dependencies of an action and computing action stamps
(with-upgradability ()
(defun (map-direct-dependencies) (operation component fun)
(defun (map-direct-dependencies) (plan operation component fun)
"Call FUN on all the valid dependencies of the given action in the given plan"
(declare (ignore plan))
(loop* :for (dep-o-spec . dep-c-specs) :in (component-depends-on operation component)
:for dep-o = (find-operation operation dep-o-spec)
:when dep-o
@ -9651,19 +9652,19 @@ to be meaningful, or could it just as well have been done in another Lisp image?
:when (action-valid-p dep-o dep-c)
:do (funcall fun dep-o dep-c))))
(defun (reduce-direct-dependencies) (operation component combinator seed)
(defun (reduce-direct-dependencies) (plan operation component combinator seed)
"Reduce the direct dependencies to a value computed by iteratively calling COMBINATOR
for each dependency action on the dependency's operation and component and an accumulator
initialized with SEED."
(map-direct-dependencies
operation component
plan operation component
#'(lambda (dep-o dep-c)
(setf seed (funcall combinator dep-o dep-c seed))))
seed)
(defun (direct-dependencies) (operation component)
(defun (direct-dependencies) (plan operation component)
"Compute a list of the direct dependencies of the action within the plan"
(reduce-direct-dependencies operation component #'acons nil))
(reduce-direct-dependencies plan operation component #'acons nil))
;; In a distant future, get-file-stamp, component-operation-time and latest-stamp
;; shall also be parametrized by the plan, or by a second model object,
@ -9687,7 +9688,7 @@ initialized with SEED."
(block ())
(let ((dep-stamp ; collect timestamp from dependencies (or T if forced or out-of-date)
(reduce-direct-dependencies
o c
plan o c
#'(lambda (o c stamp)
(if-let (it (plan-action-status plan o c))
(latest-stamp stamp (action-stamp it))
@ -9833,7 +9834,7 @@ initialized with SEED."
(return (action-stamp status))) ; Already visited with sufficient need-in-image level!
(labels ((visit-action (niip) ; We may visit the action twice, once with niip NIL, then T
(map-direct-dependencies ; recursively traverse dependencies
operation component #'(lambda (o c) (traverse-action plan o c niip)))
t operation component #'(lambda (o c) (traverse-action plan o c niip)))
(multiple-value-bind (stamp done-p) ; AFTER dependencies have been traversed,
(compute-action-stamp plan operation component) ; compute action stamp
(let ((add-to-plan-p (or (eql stamp t) (and niip (not done-p)))))
@ -9956,7 +9957,7 @@ initialized with SEED."
(define-convenience-action-methods traverse-sub-actions (operation component &key))
(defmethod traverse-sub-actions ((operation operation) (component component)
&rest keys &key &allow-other-keys)
(apply 'traverse-actions (direct-dependencies operation component)
(apply 'traverse-actions (direct-dependencies t operation component)
:system (component-system component) keys))
(defmethod plan-actions ((plan filtered-sequential-plan))
@ -11612,9 +11613,9 @@ or of opaque libraries shipped along the source code."))
;; your component-depends-on method must gather the correct dependencies in the correct order.
(while-collecting (collect)
(map-direct-dependencies
o c #'(lambda (sub-o sub-c)
(loop :for f :in (funcall key sub-o sub-c)
:when (funcall test f) :do (collect f))))))
t o c #'(lambda (sub-o sub-c)
(loop :for f :in (funcall key sub-o sub-c)
:when (funcall test f) :do (collect f))))))
(defun pathname-type-equal-function (type)
#'(lambda (p) (equalp (pathname-type p) type)))
@ -11774,7 +11775,7 @@ or of opaque libraries shipped along the source code."))
:keep-operation 'basic-load-op))
(while-collecting (x) ;; resolve the sideway-dependencies of s
(map-direct-dependencies
'load-op s
t 'load-op s
#'(lambda (o c)
(when (and (typep o 'load-op) (typep c 'system))
(x c)))))))