There's little reason for users to use these macros in their private
configs over plain ol' `with-eval-after-load` and `use-package`, unless
they're writing their own modules.
It's my fault for signal boosting them in documentation and whenever I'm
asked for help, because beginners now believe they are somehow
required for Doom to work correctly (there are guides out there
telling beginners that migrating to Doom involves replacing all
instances of `with-eval-after-load` and `use-package` in their
pre-existing configs with `after!` and `use-package!` -- which was never
true).
What's more, I plan to replace `use-package`, internally, so the
`use-package!` macro won't exist for much longer.
doom-enlist is now a deprecated alias for ensure-list, which is built
into Emacs 28.1+ and is its drop-in replacement. We've already
backported it for 27.x users in doom-lib (in 4bf4978).
Ref: 4bf49785fd
Adding `Cannot add [word] to any active dictionary` error to the
troubleshooting section.
I have had this problem multiple times now when I break my emacs and
wipe the `~/.config/emacs` directory and I can never remember what file
to create to get my spell check working properly.
Even though this is a bug and might be fixed in the future, I feel like
having it documented can be helpful in the short term and in the future.
Ref: #6246
Fewer links means less confusion.
- Merge doom-issue and doom-commit links into doom-ref (for auto-linking
Issue/PR/commit references).
- Merge doom-module-source and doom-docs-source links into doom-source.
- Rename doom-report-issue to doom-report.
- Use '!' as the icon for module issues link.
- Remove doom-repo (replaced with "doom:*" in :lang org module).
- Add doomdir and emacsdir links to :lang org module.
- Rename module from `:completion selectrum` to `:completion vertico`
- Rename all files involved
- Do *not* yet rename all the functions, as that messes up git's rename
detection.
spell-fu lacks support for multiple dictionaries, affix expansion, and
many non-English dictionaries, so I've added back flyspell support to
the spell module, but opt-in, because it is still the significantly
slower option and spell-fu may support them one day.
If not, tlikonen/wcheck-mode is another alternative to consider.
Fixes#3813
Spell-fu is significantly faster, but does produce more false
positives (more faces must be added to spell-fu-faces-exclude to reduce
these).
Unfortunately, there is no fancy "correction" interface for spell-fu
yet, so we'll have to resort to ispell-word (on z=) for now.
* :checkers spell documentation
* Fix based on changes
Fix date and version
Create TOC
Remove indentation
Remove blank lines
Hard-wrapped paragraphs
Remove comments
